• ru Русский
  • hy Armenian
  • en English
Thursday, July 10, 2025
YPC
  • Home
  • About us
    • Mission
    • Structure
    • Contact
  • Activites
    • Projects
    • Events
    • Awards
  • Production
    • Studies
    • Media Reports
    • Publications
  • Law And Ethics
    • Legislation
    • Advocacy and Expertise
    • Self-Regulation
  • Colleagues
    • Armenian Media
    • Who is Who
    • Partners
  • Periodicals
    • YPC Weekly Newsletter
    • YPC Review
    • Line of Contact
No Result
View All Result
YPC
Home YPC Weekly Newsletter

PRELIMINARY HEARINGS ON THE CASE OF “GLENDALE HILLS” VERSUS “ZHAMANAK” DAILY FINISHED

On July 8 at court of general jurisdiction of Kentron and Nork-Marash administrative districts of Yerevan finished the preliminary hearings on the suit of the construction company “Glendale Hills” versus founder and publisher of “Zhamanak” daily, “Skizb Media Kentron” LLC. The reason of the suit was the piece “‘Glendale Hills’ Offered 1000 Dollars for Silence”, published in “Zhamanak” on August 26, 2010. The article informed that in August 2010 there were collapses in a newly built house in Gyumri, and the building contractor, “Glendale Hills”, offered the tenants a financial compensation, promised to restore the damages, if only the media did not know about the incident. The suit was submitted to consideration on September 24, 2010; the preliminary sessions started since November 26, 2010. “Glendale Hills” demanded from “Zhamanak” founder to refute the information as contained in the piece that discredit its business reputation, compensate the damage caused by defamation of 2 million AMD (about $ 5400) and cover the court expenses of 500,000 AMD.

At the session of July 8 the advocate of the respondent, Nikolay Baghdasarian, proposed to take the question to arbitration or consider it in a non-judicial procedure. Nikolay Baghdasarian also informed YPC that during the preliminary hearings he had made a petition to suspend court proceedings – in order to give the “Zhamanak” founder a possibility of addressing the RA Constitutional Court on the issue of constitutionality of some provisions of Article 1087.1 (“Order and Conditions of Compensation of Damage to the Honor, Dignity or Business Reputation”) of RA Civil Code. However the court put off the consideration of the petition.

The core hearings are appointed on September 5.

Previous Post

“The Role of the EaP Civil Society Forum in Fostering Public Administration and Fight against Corruption”

Next Post

YEREVAN PRESS CLUB MARKED ITS 16TH ANNIVERSARY

  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact

Copyright ©2015 Yerevan Press Club. All rights, including copyright and database right, in the Yerevan Press Club's website and its contents are owned by or licensed to the Yerevan Press Club, or otherwise used by the Yerevan Press Club as permitted by applicable law. The website is created with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the Yerevan Press Club and do not necessarily represent the views of USAID or the U.S. Government.

MADE BY
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About us
    • Mission
    • Structure
    • Contact
  • Activites
    • Projects
    • Events
    • Awards
  • Production
    • Studies
    • Media Reports
    • Publications
  • Law And Ethics
    • Legislation
    • Advocacy and Expertise
    • Self-Regulation
  • Colleagues
    • Armenian Media
    • Who is Who
    • Partners
  • Periodicals
    • YPC Weekly Newsletter
    • YPC Review
    • Line of Contact
  • ru Русский
  • hy Armenian
  • en English

Copyright ©2015 Yerevan Press Club. All rights, including copyright and database right, in the Yerevan Press Club's website and its contents are owned by or licensed to the Yerevan Press Club, or otherwise used by the Yerevan Press Club as permitted by applicable law. The website is created with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the Yerevan Press Club and do not necessarily represent the views of USAID or the U.S. Government.